Belie the belief? Prompts and default states
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Default Reasoning and Belief
As an important variant of Reiter's default logic, Poole (1988) developed a nonmonotonic reasoning framework in the classical rst-order language. Brewka and Nebel extended Poole's approach in order to enable a representation of priorities between defaults. In this paper we present a general framework for default reasoning, which can be viewed as a common generalization of the three approaches a...
متن کاملBelief functions and default reasoning
We present a new approach to dealing with default information based on the theory of belief functions. Our semantic structures, inspired by Adams' ε-semantics, are epsilon-belief assignments, where values committed to focal elements are either close to 0 or close to 1. We define two systems based on these structures, and relate them to other nonmonotonic systems presented in the literature. We ...
متن کاملBelief Coordination by Default
Use of confirmations in dialogue is mundane and ubiquitous, but theoretically it has been a puzzle how confirmations serve their supposed end, namely to secure the establishment of mutual understandings between dialogue participants. We propose a solution to this confirmation puzzle by introducing the notion of defeasible mutual Imowledge. The notion is based upon our intuition that mutual beli...
متن کاملDefault reasoning and the transferable belief model
Except when explicitly stated, all belief functions used in this paper are simple support functions, i.e. belief functions for which only one proposition (the focus) of the frame of discernment receives a positive basic belief mass with the remaining mass being given to the tautology. Each belief function will be described by its focus and the weight of the focus (e.g. m(A)=.9). Computation of ...
متن کاملRules, Belief Functions and Default Logic
This paper describes a natural framework for rules , based on belief functions , which includes a repre s entation of numerical rules, default rules and rules allowing and rules not allowing contraposition. In particular it justifies the use of th e Dempster-Shafer Th eory for representing a particular class of rules , Belief calculated being a lower probability given cer tain independence as...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Religion, Brain & Behavior
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2153-599X,2153-5981
DOI: 10.1080/2153599x.2018.1498381